Web   Contender



  Christian Apologetics
  A Course in Miracles
  Jehovahs Witnesses
  New Age
  Unitarian Universalism

Our Ads are automatically placed based on the content of the page in which they appear.  We do not have the option of choosing which ads appear on the site.   This can result in the appearance of Ads we do not endorse and with which we seriously disagree. We filter these ads as we find them, but this takes time. Your patience is appreciated.

A Beginning of Global Governance - #1 in a series
Prophetic Signs that we are in the End Times
The Earth Charter's Spiritual Agenda - #2 in a Series
The New Age Influence at the United Nations - #3 in a Series
Jesus is the Messiah Prophesied in the Old Testament
Like a Thief in the Night - The Rapture of the Church
The Coming War of Gog and Magog, an Islamic Invasion?
Muslim, Jewish, and Christian Prophecy Comparison
The Millennial Kingdom
There will be False Christs
Is the E.U. the Revived Roman Empire?
Should We Study End-Time Prophecy?
Apostasy and the Laodicean Dilemma
Christian Tracts
What We Believe
Our Mission
Contact Us

Contender Ministries highly recommends Dr. Gary Frazier's new book "It Could Happen Tomorrow - Future Events That will Shake the World".  This is a must read for every Christian, and will be an invaluable guide to the end-times for anyone interested in Bible prophecy.


This book will not only inform you, it will inspire you and challenge you to increased evangelistic consciousness, greater missionary concern, and a desire to live a holy life in an unholy age.
    - Tim Lahaye, co-author of the New York Times Bestselling Series Left Behind



Worldnet Daily

Henry Lamb

June 26, 2004


The United States created the United Nations; now the United States should kill it. The bloated bureaucracy has become moribund, corrupt and is a hotbed of anti-American propaganda. The United States should pull the financial plug and let the institution pass peacefully into history.

Not only has the U.N. failed to realize its original peacekeeping vision, it has recast its original vision and now sees its role to be the administrator of global governance. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 1998, and the unending efforts to establish global taxing authority are the last remaining elements needed to empower the U.N. to enforce sovereign equality over all nations including the U.S.

Had the Democrats won the 2000 presidential election, both of these elements would likely be in place. George Bush, however, withdrew the U.S. signature from the International Criminal Court Charter, and he blocked the advance of global taxing authority at the U.N.'s Monterrey Conference on Financing Development. Democrats, the U.N. and much of the world severely criticized the Bush administration for what they called "unilateral cowboy" action.

The International Criminal Court claims authority over all nations including the U.S. even though the U.S. is not a party to it. To protect U.S. soldiers from political harassment, the Bush administration negotiated an exemption resolution by the U.N. Security Council two years ago. That exemption expires on June 30.

Kofi Annan opposed any renewal of the exemption. According to the New York Times, Annan said:

"I think in this circumstance it would be unwise to press for an exemption, and it would be even more unwise on the part of the Security Council to grant it. It would discredit the Council and the United Nations that stands for rule of law and the primacy of the rule of law."

Say what? Exactly which "rule of law" authorizes the corruption in the U.N.'s oil for food program? Which "rule of law" authorizes the corruption in the office of the corruption czar?

In the face of certain defeat, the Bush administration withdrew the resolution from further consideration.

Now, the United States should withdraw its troops from all U.N. peacekeeping operations. The U.S. should stop payment of all peacekeeping funds and remove the item from next year's budget.

This action should signal the beginning of an orderly withdrawal from the United Nations system, while the United States redefines its role in the international community. The United States has already negotiated bilateral agreements with 89 nations to protect U.S. citizens from ICC jurisdiction. This effort should be expanded. It makes no sense to continue to support the U.N., an organization whose goal is the creation of a system of global governance that is antithetical to the system of governance created by the U.S. Constitution.

Instead, the United States should fashion a foreign policy that celebrates and encourages individual freedom, representative government and equal national sovereignty.

As difficult as this course may be, it is the only course the U.S. can follow and be true to its founding principles. As foggy as the battlefield in Iraq may be, it could be the phoenix from which rises a prototype of the new vision of U.S. foreign policy.

The new policy should honor every nation's right to choose its own form of government, so long as it poses no threat to the United States. When any nation, regardless of its form of government, becomes a threat to U.S. security, then the U.S. should remove the threat and encourage reconstruction on the principles of freedom.

The U.N.'s vision of global governance is built upon socialism, a system that cannot sustain its own bureaucratic weight. An American vision of equal sovereignty for all nations envisions a world community of voluntary cooperation and mutual benefit without a global authority, a global tax, a global court, a global army or a secretary-general.


Source Article: